|
IRB Review
Categories
The RU IRB will
classify your research into one of four categories:
Course Exempt
Exempt
Expedited
Full Review
Course Exempt
This classification is predominantly for Radford
University faculty that wish to incorporate research methodology
into a course at RU. Specific requirements must be met in
order to receive a course exempt status. In particular, the
faculty member must ensure that the research that will be performed
by the students meets the following criteria:
-
NO
MINORS:
The project cannot
include anyone under age 18 or any other vulnerable populations
like pregnant women, prisoners, those who lack the capacity
to consent, non-English speaking individuals.
-
NO
MORE THAN MINIMAL RISK:
"Minimal risk" is the
probability and magnitude of harm that is normally
encountered in the daily lives of healthy individuals. This
also precludes the study of any illegal activities (e.g.,
underage drinking, illegal drug use) or the collection of
private information that could put the participants at risk
through a breach of confidentiality.
-
NO
INTERVENTIONS:
The class project cannot include any intervention designed
to produce long-term changes in participants.
An intervention includes both physical procedures by which
data are gathered (for example, venipuncture) and
manipulations of the subject or the subject's environment
that are performed for research purposes.
-
NO
DECEPTION:
The class project cannot include any deception. Individuals
must be fully informed and given the opportunity to
voluntarily consent to participate.
-
NO
PUBLICATION:
Data from class projects approved under this exemption
cannot be used for publication or for thesis/dissertation
research. Information from the project may not be
disseminated outside the RU Community, unless approved by the IRB on a case-by-case basis; this includes
publicly accessible posting on the WWW and use of other
media for findings dissemination.
-
NO PRESENTATION EXTERNAL TO RU: Data from class projects approved under this exemption may not be used for presentation at any extra-university forum, unless approved by the IRB on a case-by-case basis, or any university forum open to any persons not affiliated with Radford University.
-
NO VIDEOTAPING
OR AUDIO TAPING
- NOT AN INDEPENDENT OR DIRECTED STUDY OR THESIS OR DISSERTATION
For more information on what you will need to submit
to the IRB for consideration as course exempt, see
IRB Forms
Exempt
Exempt research must be of minimal
risk. According to 45 CFR 46.102(i),
minimal risk means that the probability and magnitude of harm
or discomfort anticipated in the research are not greater in and of
themselves than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during
the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or
tests.
Listed below are the six categories of human subjects
research that the federal government considers to be exempt:
1. Research conducted in established
or commonly accepted educational settings, involving normal
educational practices, such as:
a.
research on regular and special education instructional strategies,
or
b.
research on the effectiveness of or the comparison among
instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom management
methods.
c.
the research is not FDA regulated
2. Research involving the use of
educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement),
survey procedures, interview procedures or observation of public
behavior, unless:
a.
information obtained is recorded in such a manner that human
subjects can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked
to the subjects; and
b.
any disclosure of the human subjects' responses outside the research
could reasonably place the subjects at risk of criminal or civil
liability or be damaging to the subjects' financial standing,
employability, or reputation.
c.
the research involves surveys of children, interviews of children,
or observation of public behavior of children where the
investigators participate in the activities being observed.
3. Research involving the use of
educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement),
survey procedures, interview procedures, or observation of public
behavior that is not exempt under #2 of this section, if:
a.
The human subjects are elected or appointed public officials or
candidates for public office; or
b.
federal statutes require without exception that the
confidentiality of the personally identifiable information will be
maintained throughout the research and thereafter.
4. Research involving the
collection or study of existing data, documents, records,
pathological specimens, or diagnostic specimens, if these sources
are publicly available or if the information is recorded by the
investigator in such a manner that subjects cannot be identified,
directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects.
5. Research and demonstration
projects which are conducted by or subject to the approval of
department or agency heads, and which are designed to study,
evaluate, or otherwise examine:
a.
public benefit or service programs;
b.
procedures for obtaining benefits or services under those programs;
c.
possible changes in or alternatives to those programs or procedures;
or
d.
possible changes in methods or levels of payment for benefits or
services under those programs.
6. Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer acceptance
studies, (i) if wholesome foods without additives are consumed or
(ii) if a food is consumed that contains a food ingredient at or
below the level and for a use found to be safe, or agricultural
chemical or environmental contaminant at or below the level found to
be safe, by the Food and Drug Administration or approved by the
Environmental Protection Agency or the Food Safety and Inspection
Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
In addition to the federal statues,
Radford University has the following policies regarding
exempt research:
Radford University does not allow
exemption of research that involves interventions (an
intervention is any outside process that has the effect of modifying
an individual's behavior, cognition, or emotional state) or
interactions with individuals confined to:
-
Behavioral health facilities
-
Long-term care facilities
-
Prisons
or other correctional facilities
-
Any
other facility where an individual's freedom of movement is
restricted
Research with children can be granted exempt status
only if the research involves (1) Surveys of children, or (2)
Interviews of children, or (3) Observation of public behavior
where the investigator(s) DO NOT participate in the activities
being observed.
Radford University does not allow exemption for any
studies involving videotaping or audio taping.
There are 3 areas of exempt research
that are most pertinent to educational research:
1. Research conducted in educational
settings, involving normal educational practices.
2. Research using educational tests,
surveys, interviews, or observations of public behavior.
3. Secondary use of EXISTING
data (data collected [by anyone] before your study for some
other purpose [e.g., prior test scores]).
Expedited Review
Protocols determined to be minimal risk, but not falling
into any exempt category, may be considered for expedited review.
Research must meet all of the following criteria in order to be reviewed
by the IRB through an expedited review procedure (45 CFR 46 §110):
1. Be of minimal risk to the subjects
2. Must not involve prisoners or mentally impaired persons
3. Must be in one or more of the following categories:
A. Clinical studies of : (a) Research on drugs for which an
investigational new drug application (21 CFR Part 312) is not
required. (Note: Research on marketed drugs that significantly
increases the risks or decreases the acceptability of the risks
associated with the use of the product is not eligible for
expedited review.) (b) Research on medical devices for which (i)
an investigational device exemption application (21 CFR Part
812) is not required; or (ii) the medical device is
cleared/approved for marketing and the medical device is being
used in accordance with its cleared/approved labeling.
B. Collection of blood samples by finger stick, heel stick,
ear stick, or venipuncture as follows: (a) from healthy,
nonpregnant adults who weigh at least 110 pounds. For these
subjects, the amounts drawn may not exceed 550 ml in an 8 week
period and collection may not occur more frequently than 2 times
per week; or (b) from other adults and children, considering
the age, weight, and health of the subjects, the collection
procedure, the amount of blood to be collected, and the
frequency with which it will be collected. For these subjects,
the amount drawn may not exceed the lesser of 50 ml or 3 ml per
kg in an 8-week period and collection may not occur more
frequently than 2 times per week.
C. Prospective collection of biological specimens for
research purposes by noninvasive means. Examples: (a) hair and
nail clippings in a nondisfiguring manner; (b) deciduous teeth
at time of exfoliation or if routine patient care indicates a
need for extraction; (c) permanent teeth if routine patient care
indicates a need for extraction; (d) excreta and external
secretions (including sweat); (e) uncannulated saliva collected
either in an unstimulated fashion or stimulated by chewing
gumbase or wax or by applying a dilute citric solution to the
tongue; (f) placenta removed at delivery; (g) amniotic fluid
obtained at the time of rupture of the membrane prior to or
during labor; (h) supra- and subgingival dental plaque and
calculus, provided the collection procedure is not more invasive
than routine prophylactic scaling of the teeth and the process
is accomplished in accordance with accepted prophylactic
techniques; (i) mucosal and skin cells collected by buccal
scraping or swab, skin swab, or mouth washings; (j) sputum
collected after saline mist nebulization.
D. Collection of data through noninvasive procedures (not
involving general anesthesia or sedation) routinely employed in
clinical practice, excluding procedures involving x-rays or
microwaves. Where medical devices are employed, they must be
cleared/approved for marketing. (Studies intended to evaluate
the safety and effectiveness of the medical device are not
generally eligible for expedited review, including studies of
cleared medical devices for new indications.) Examples: (a)
physical sensors that are applied either to the surface of the
body or at a distance and do not involve input of significant
amounts of energy into the subject or an invasion of the
subjects privacy; (b) weighing or testing sensory acuity; (c)
magnetic resonance imaging; (d) electrocardiography,
electroencephalography, thermography, detection of naturally
occurring radioactivity, electroretinography, ultrasound,
diagnostic infrared imaging, doppler blood flow, and
echocardiography; (e) moderate exercise, muscular strength
testing, body composition assessment, and flexibility testing
where appropriate given the age, weight, and health of the
individual.
E. Research involving materials (data, documents, records, or
specimens) that have been collected, or will be collected solely
for nonresearch purposes (such as medical treatment or
diagnosis).
F. Collection of data from voice, video, digital, or image
recordings made for research purposes.
G. Research on individual or group characteristics or
behavior (including, but not limited to, research on perception,
cognition, motivation, identity, language, communication,
cultural beliefs or practices, and social behavior) or research
employing survey, interview, oral history, focus group, program
evaluation, human factors evaluation, or quality assurance
methodologies. (NOTE: Some research in this category may be
exempt from the HHS regulations for the protection of human
subjects. 45 CFR 46.101(b)(2) and (b)(3). This listing refers
only to research that is not exempt.)
Full review
All protocols determined by the IRB Administrator to be more than minimal
risk (i.e. failing to meet the requirements of Exempt or Expedited
Review) are required by federal and state regulation to be
reviewed and approved by a fully convened IRB. If your
protocol is greater than minimal risk, you will be notified by the
IRB Administrator of the IRB Committee meeting with any required changes/corrections to the protocol prior to distributing the protocol documents to the committee. Full board review protocols must be submitted
3 weeks in advance of the IRB meeting for all faculty submissions, and two weeks in
advance for all graduate student protocols. The IRB meeting
dates and submission deadlines are posted
here.
|